Here Puss, Puss, Puss

Recently I was in Florida at a veterinary conference. Attached to the conference facility was a large hall full of exhibitors touting everything from the latest surgical instruments to stem cell treatments. There was also a booth belonging to Alley Cat Allies (https://www.alleycat.org).  Intrigued, I sauntered over to take a look. Unfortunately they represent an organisation that, rather than attempting to solve the feral cat problem, seem destined to perpetuate it by their program of trap and neuter. This works by catching feral cats, desexing them, vaccinating them and then letting them go again. The result is a vaccinated population of cats that cannot breed, which will hopefully lead to a gradual decline in the population.

Unfortunately what it doesn’t address is the fact that feral cats, sterilised or not, still need to eat. In Australia it is estimated that cats chew their way through 3.8 million native Australian animals annually (http://www.derm.qld.gov.au/wildlife-ecosystems/wildlife/threats_to_wildlife/cat.html). Add that to the fact that they also spread diseases such as toxoplasmosis, a condition which causes large numbers of marsupial deaths each year. After some “lively” discussion the Allies put it to me that the situation in America is different to Australia, as American animals evolved with a feline presence e.g. bobcats and mountain lions. Unfortunately no one mentioned this to the sea otters that are dying of toxoplasmosis off the California coast.

The only sensible way to manage feral cats is to euthanase them. No one would suggest trap and neuter programs for foxes or rabbits (at least I hope not) and I don’t see why feral cats should be treated differently. They are treated differently because of our emotional attachment to cats (as discussed in “All Animals Are Equal”). One argument advanced against the trap and euthanase method is that fresh cats will wander in to fill the void. Good. Then they can be euthanased too until, hopefully, there are no more cats left to euthanase. The New Zealanders have successfully re-introduced a number of native bird species to some of their offshore islands. They were only able to do this, not by desexing and releasing cats, but by removing every last one of them.

The root of the problem obviously goes back to irresponsible cat owners who, for whatever reason, lose interest in their pet and decide to turn it loose on the world instead of either rehoming it or having it euthanased. For a more realistic discussion of the feral cat problem see “Who’s For Cats?” at http://www.whosforcats.com.au/.

And the definition of a feral cat? According to a friend of mine, it’s any cat found more than 100 metres from a house that doesn’t answer to “Here Puss, Puss, Puss”.

Dr. F. Bunny

, ,

  1. #1 by woodsman001 on 18/05/2012 - 5:12 am

    TNR-Advocates “Vacuum Effect” is an absolute 100% LIE.

    There’s an interesting study done by the Texas A&M University on TNR practices. They started out with about 12 sterilized cats. At the end of 9 months they had over 30. An increase of more than 200%, all moved in of their own volition. This isn’t due to any mythical “vacuum effect” that cat-advocates spread and lie about so often. You would have had to remove cats to create a vacuum for others to replace them. The exact opposite happened in this study.

    Simple reason being: CATS ATTRACT CATS

    Cat scents attract cats. This is why they spray everything; to attract mates, rivals, and mark territory. Cat sounds attract cats. Mewing kittens will even attract stray toms who kill the kittens if they are not their own (basic feline behavior of any cat species).

    Another interesting finding, sterilized cats very poorly defend their territory. Any new cats see this as easy-pickings and move in to take over. If that cat-colony is being fed then non-sterilized cats will actually overtake the sterilized colony’s food-source because the non-sterilized cats are not as docile and complacent. If there IS any kind of “vacuum effect” at all, it is that sterilizing cats cause unsterilized cats to fill their reproductive void.

    If you want more cats, keep some around. More will find you. Get rid of them all and there’s no reason for other cats to come to that area. I proved this myself by getting rid of every last cat on my own land, HUNDREDS of them. ZERO cats moved in to replace them for OVER TWO YEARS now. Should even ONE ever show up again? Shoot-on-sight A.S.A.P. Because if you don’t? You’ll be up to your a** in cats again, with them annihilating the whole native food-chain again in just a short matter of time.

  2. #2 by vetsbeyondreason on 20/05/2012 - 9:57 am

    Thanks very much for your comment. It hadn’t occurred to me that sterilized cats would be poor defenders of territory but you’re right. The testosterone charged entire cats would easily bully the other ones out of house and home further compounding issues of malnutrition and disease. Congratulations on your cat free property.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: